Pros and Cons of Rent Control: A Landlord’s Guide to Surviving the Shift

Updated 04/16/25

As rent prices soar across many major U.S. cities, rent control laws are becoming more common—and more controversial. For landlords, these laws can present both unique challenges and unexpected opportunities. Whether you own a small portfolio of single-family homes or manage multi-unit buildings, understanding the pros and cons of keeping rent-controlled units is essential to making informed investment decisions.

Is Buying a Rent Controlled Property a Good Idea?

This article is designed to help landlords cut through the noise. We’ll break down the meaning and implications of rent control, explain how it’s evolving across the country, and offer a balanced look at how it can impact your bottom line. From legislative updates like AB 1482 California to long-term rental property investment risks, this is your go-to guide.

Table of Contents

What Is Rent Control and How Does It Work?

Rent control, often referred to as rent stabilization, limits how much a landlord can increase rent annually. Some laws cap rent hikes at a fixed percentage, such as 5%, while others base increases on inflation or cost of living indexes. The primary goal is to keep rental units affordable for tenants and to prevent displacement due to gentrification.

In cities with tenant rent protection laws, rent control is one of the most powerful tools used to combat rapid rent inflation. However, many landlords argue that these laws fail to account for the real costs of property management, repairs, and upgrades. Understanding this dynamic is crucial when weighing the rent control pros and cons.

Which States and Cities Have Rent Control?

Rent control isn’t a nationwide policy—it’s highly localized. States like California, New York, and Oregon have rent stabilization laws in place, though each operates under different frameworks. For example, rent control in San Diego falls under the state’s broader legislative umbrella, particularly AB 1482.

Meanwhile, some states have landlord tenant laws that explicitly ban local governments from enacting rent control at all. These legal patchworks can make it difficult for landlords to scale operations across state lines or plan long-term.

Why Tenants Support Rent Control Laws

For tenants, the appeal of rent control is simple: stability. With protections in place, they’re less likely to face steep rent increases or be forced out of their homes due to rising costs. Families can stay in one location, which benefits children’s education, employment stability, and overall well-being.

In cities experiencing housing shortages, rent control is also seen as a mechanism for ensuring equity. It offers relief to lower-income renters and provides a buffer during inflationary periods. This public support often drives political pressure for more regulation.

How Rent Control Affects Landlords Financially

From a landlord’s perspective, rent control changes the financial landscape. It limits how quickly you can adjust rents to match market demand or recover from inflation-related operating costs. This can shrink your profit margins, especially if maintenance or insurance costs go up while rents remain static.

The disadvantages of rent control become more pronounced when a property requires significant repairs or upgrades. If your rent is capped, you may struggle to recoup investment costs. Moreover, it could deter you from taking on new property purchases in areas with strict controls, adding to overall rental property investment risks.

Pros and Cons of Rent Control for Tenants and Landlords

Navigating the pros and cons of keeping rent-controlled units starts with recognizing how outcomes differ depending on your goals. For tenants, the benefits are clear—affordable and predictable rent. For landlords, the positives include longer lease terms and lower vacancy rates, since tenants are less likely to move out when rents remain low.

However, this comes at a cost. When rent increases are restricted, it can reduce your property’s value over time and limit your ability to compete with market-rate landlords. This especially impacts smaller landlords who don’t have the same scale advantages as large property management firms.

One of the lesser-discussed consequences of rent control is its effect on property improvements. Since landlords can’t raise rent to offset renovation costs, many delay or forgo upgrades altogether. Over time, this can result in aging buildings with outdated systems, creating a gap in quality between rent-controlled and market-rate properties.

This creates a cycle: tenants stay longer in units that degrade over time, landlords can’t justify improvements, and both sides suffer. Unlike incentives offered in luxury markets, rent stabilization vs rent control policies often penalize those who invest in better living conditions.

Do Rent Control Laws Apply to New or Older Buildings?

Most rent control laws exempt newer construction. For example, California’s AB 1482 doesn’t apply to properties built within the last 15 years. Instead, the focus is on older housing stock—typically buildings constructed before 1995 or even 1980, depending on the jurisdiction.

This means landlords purchasing rent control for older buildings need to understand what laws apply and what flexibility they have in raising rents. The age of the property is a key factor, and in some cases, it’s the determining element for whether a unit falls under regulation.

How Rent Control Impacts Real Estate Investment

Rent control policies introduce more complexity into real estate investing. Investors may shy away from markets where returns are limited, or shift to short-term rentals or commercial real estate. Lenders may also view properties with rent restrictions as higher risk, which can affect your ability to secure financing.

In some cities, landlords are pivoting strategies to find creative workarounds—such as converting units to condos or owner-occupying properties to regain control. Still, the uncertainty can be enough to push even seasoned investors to reconsider their portfolios.

Will Rent Control Discourage New Housing Construction?

Absolutely—and this is one of the most common critiques. Developers are less likely to build in regions where rental income potential is capped from day one. With rising land and construction costs, they need confidence that rents will justify the investment.

This is especially true for large-scale developments that take years to complete. If political tides shift and new regulations are passed during construction, the project’s entire financial model can collapse. As a result, many argue that rent control, while helping existing tenants, slows the growth of available housing overall.

What Landlords Need to Know About AB 1482 in California

AB 1482, also known as the Tenant Protection Act, is California’s statewide rent control law. It limits annual rent increases to 5% plus inflation (capped at 10%) and includes tenant rent protection laws that prevent no-cause evictions for long-term tenants.

This law applies to most rental properties over 15 years old, including single-family homes not owned by individuals. For landlords in San Diego, Los Angeles, and other major markets, AB 1482 has changed the rules of engagement—and it’s vital to stay compliant. Failure to do so can result in hefty fines and legal challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there any benefits for landlords under rent control laws?
Yes. Rent-controlled tenants tend to stay longer, reducing vacancy and turnover costs. You also gain predictability in your rental income.

Can landlords raise rent above the allowed limit if they renovate?
Only in some cases. Certain jurisdictions allow temporary rent increases for major capital improvements, but they must be approved and documented.

What types of properties are exempt from rent control laws?
New construction (typically 15 years or newer), owner-occupied buildings, and certain single-family homes may be exempt under state laws like AB 1482.

How does rent control affect property values?
Rent-controlled properties often have lower resale value because of income limitations, making them less attractive to investors or banks.

Should landlords avoid rent-controlled areas?
Not necessarily. While there are limitations, rent-controlled units can offer long-term stability and lower turnover. The key is understanding the full legal and financial implications.